...this is incompatible with an ultra-literal interpretation of Genesis, but long before Darwin, there were many thoughtful interpreters like St. Augustine, who found it impossible to be exactly sure what the meaning of that amazing creation story was supposed to be. So attaching oneself to such literal interpretations in the face of compelling scientific evidence pointing to the ancient age of Earth and the relatedness of living things by evolution seems neither wise nor necessary for the believer.
Dr. Francis Collins
Full text here.
(Thanks Jeho)
Dr. Francis Collins
Full text here.
(Thanks Jeho)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-06 00:08 (UTC)This was exactly my point. Sorry I didn't make it better.
I think I'll go back into lurking mode now.
- Jeho
no subject
Date: 2007-04-06 02:08 (UTC)Now, in short, the gist of what I was trying to say is that despite the fact that I am not Christian, I'm perfectly comfortable with the idea that Jesus existed, albeit probably not in the form that we have come to know about him in the 21st century.
Now, if you want to continue this discussion which has taken a decidedly ad hominem sort of twist that I'm not particularly happy with, I'm happy to do so in private and get it out of William's comments log.
William has my personal email address. Ask him for it. I'm happy for you to have it.
- Jeho