...this is incompatible with an ultra-literal interpretation of Genesis, but long before Darwin, there were many thoughtful interpreters like St. Augustine, who found it impossible to be exactly sure what the meaning of that amazing creation story was supposed to be. So attaching oneself to such literal interpretations in the face of compelling scientific evidence pointing to the ancient age of Earth and the relatedness of living things by evolution seems neither wise nor necessary for the believer.
Dr. Francis Collins
Full text here.
(Thanks Jeho)
Dr. Francis Collins
Full text here.
(Thanks Jeho)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 14:40 (UTC)If you get a chance to see him speak, he has a wonderfully calming way about him - easy to listen to.
I only have issue with one statement in the article -
"Here was a person (Jesus) with remarkably strong historical evidence of his life"
That is far from truthful. It is one of the widest spread disinformations out there.
Actual historical data of this person is non-existant outside of church documents generated centuries after the alleged incidents. I would not call church documents unbiased or accurate for historical documentation.
Sorry.
But that does not detract from the message of acceptance and co-existence he is bringing.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 15:10 (UTC)