Court Finding

[mapsedge]

UK Court Finds that "An Inconvenient Truth" is more accurately "An Inconvenient Ignoring of the Evidence"

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/09/court-identifies-eleven-inaccuracies-al-gore-s-inconvenient-truth

For the record: I don't disagree with global warming.  I disagree with the hubris that suggests that we humans are responsible for it and, indeed, capable of stopping it.  Mother Earth is bigger than us.

Comments

[iarraidh.livejournal.com]

"The ruling stated the film was broadly accurate, but alarmist and exaggerated many effects."

http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=65583

So the movie in total was accurate, but there were 9 particular points the court felt veered from the scientific concrete.

That doesn't sound as much as of a rejection of the premise as the Right Wingnut media would declare.

I mean, for god's sake, "NewsBusters - Exposing and Combatting Liberal Media Bias"

THERE's Fair and Balanced for ya.

Spin is spin, whether it's left spin or right spin.