Well, I think I shall give up on YouTube as a video distribution channel. Their encoders just can't compete. Have a look at Jamie Raeburn - which I posted a while back - as it appears on Revver. Much much better quality, even in full screen mode.
I'll keep YouTube as a place for personal videos, but anything I'd hope to use as a portfolio piece will go to Revver. There's a longer post in this, but it will have to wait.
And just because I'm a bit of a whore when it comes to this sort of thing, if you should happen to have friends and/or acquaintances who might appreciate the video, please share the link. Click the "menu" button and choose "Share". It will provide you a link you can copy to an email.
I'll keep YouTube as a place for personal videos, but anything I'd hope to use as a portfolio piece will go to Revver. There's a longer post in this, but it will have to wait.
And just because I'm a bit of a whore when it comes to this sort of thing, if you should happen to have friends and/or acquaintances who might appreciate the video, please share the link. Click the "menu" button and choose "Share". It will provide you a link you can copy to an email.
nice...
Date: 2008-08-08 19:41 (UTC)Guess I'll have to go find it again :)
YouTube resolution hack
Date: 2008-08-08 19:44 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-08 19:58 (UTC)Re: YouTube resolution hack
Date: 2008-08-08 19:58 (UTC)Revver still gets my vote, though. I'm planning a more detailed post for later, but the extremely short version is that Revver offers revenue sharing based on video views, something YouTube, so far as I know, doesn't do.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 05:17 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 01:10 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 03:08 (UTC)Believe it or not the audio used for this video is a scratch track and not the finished song for the CD: in the instrumental bit between the first and second verses, you can distinctly hear a floor squeak.